Postcards

Postcards

RSS feed

If you use an RSS reader, here is feed for Postcards: XML.
Learn more about RSS.

What's on this page?

The entry titled "Cornyn transcript from Petraeus hearing."

Categories

• Abortion/adoption
• Agencies
• Attorney general
• Border
• Business and economic development
• Campaign finance
• Capitol
• Comings and goings
• Constitutional amendments
• Criminal justice
• Data Center
• Death
• Democratic National Convention
• Democratic politics
• Democratic State Convention
• Education
• Elections
• Electric power industry
• Environment
• Ethics
• Family and protective services
• Financial crisis
• Gambling
• Governor
• Governor's Mansion Restoration
• Health & human services
• Higher education
• Homeland security
• House
• Hurricane Ike
• Immigration
• Inaugural
• Insurance
• Journalism
• Land use/development
• Legal Affairs
• Legislative races
• Military
• Money
• netroots nation
• On a Lighter Note
• Open government
• Podcast: Texas Political Parlor
• Polygamist sect
• President
• Presidential race
• Public safety
• Republican National Convention
• Republican politics
• Republican State Convention
• Secretary of State
• Senate
• Speaker's race
• State budget
• State contracting
• State of the Union
• Supreme Court of Texas
• Taxes
• Texas Independence Day
• Texas Railroad Commission
• Texas Senate
• Texas Youth Commission
• Transportation
• U.S. Congress
• U.S. Senate
• Unemployment

Home > Postcards > Archives > 2008 > April > 10 > Entry

Cornyn transcript from Petraeus hearing

By Jason Embry | Thursday, April 10, 2008, 12:15 PM

Courtesy of our good friends at Congressional Quarterly, here’s a transcript of Sen. John Cornyn’s exchange with Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker earlier this week at the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing:

CORNYN: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Ambassador Crocker and General Petraeus, it’s good to see you again. I had the honor of visiting you and many of the Texas troops and other men and women in uniform in January. And good to see you then and good to see you here today.

I want to start by asking, General, the purpose of the counterinsurgency strategy, sometimes now called the surge, was to give the Iraqis the basic protection to protect the Iraqi population, and to give the Iraqi government and the Iraqi people the chance to develop their own political arrangements so that, as in the words in the Iraq Study Group, that we would leave them with the capacity to govern and to defend themselves.

Is that — would you accept my summary?

PETRAEUS: I would, Senator.

CORNYN: Or maybe state it better than I did?

PETRAEUS: No, I think that’s fine, sir. CORNYN: And that leads me to the — Ambassador Crocker, to the benchmarks.

And I know there’s been a lot of debate and I seem to recall some of your writing about whether these benchmarks that the United States government laid down in 2007 — whether they were really the appropriate measures.

But let’s just set that argument aside for a minute and just talk about what sort of success the Iraqi government has had in meeting those 18 benchmarks that we identified in 2007. It’s my recollection that they have successfully completed 12 of those 18 benchmarks. Can you either correct me or clarify and expand upon the developments in that area?

CROCKER: I think that’s about right, Senator.

We’re actually just going through a process now between us out in Baghdad and folks back here, in reevaluating the status of the benchmarks. But clearly they have gained some real momentum after an admittedly slow beginning.

Amnesty is a benchmark, for example. Accountability and justice; de-Baathification reform is a benchmark. Provincial powers, in its election dimension, is a benchmark.

So, in the space of just a little over one month, we saw them achieve three really significant new benchmarks.

CORNYN: General Petraeus, I remember General Odierno, who, of course, has served with you in Iraq, commander of 3 Corps and Fort Hood, pending his nomination as vice chairman — vice chief of staff of the Army — I remember him saying that what he thought the American people wanted to see out in Iraq was progress — progress.

Would both of you characterize what we have seen over the last year, in Iraq, both from a military and security standpoint, as well as from a political reconciliation standpoint, as progress?

PETRAEUS: I would, Senator.

CROCKER: Yes. Yes, very much, sir.

CORNYN: I want to just ask a question about the consequences of failure in Iraq.

Because, of course, we all want our troops to come home as soon as they can. I think, giving both sides the benefit of the doubt, I would say the disagreement is over whether it’s based on a political or a timetable, which I would call political, without regard to conditions, and those of us who believe it ought to be a conditions- based reduction in our troops. You touched on this, I believe, a little bit — both of you did — in your opening statement. But I think it’s worth repeating.

Because I think the connection that — as you pointed out, General Petraeus, our troops not only want to know that we appreciate them, but I think their families and they want to understand how their sacrifice is directly connected with our safety and security here at home.

And sometimes I think that gets lost in the debates here on Capitol Hill.

So traveling to Afghanistan, as I did in January before I came to Iraq, I, of course, was reminded of what happened in that failed state after the Soviet Union left, where the Taliban and Al Qaida basically used that as an opportunity to organize, train and launch attacks, most notoriously on September the 11th, 2001.

Do you see the consequences of a failed state in Iraq were we to withdraw before conditions would allow it — the Iraqis to govern and defend themselves, giving — increasing the probability that Iraq could in fact become a similar failed state to Afghanistan from the standpoint of allowing space, time and opportunity for Al Qaida and other terrorist organizations to reorganize and plot and potentially export similar attacks against the United States or our allies?

PETRAEUS: Senator, as I mentioned, not achieving our goals, our interests in Iraq indeed could lead Al Qaida to regain lost territory, could see a resumption of the kind of sectarian — ethno-sectarian violence that tore the country apart in 2006 and into early 2007. No telling what can happen in terms of the Iranian influence piece. And then just general regional stability challenges, not to mention with the connection with the global economy.

So, again, there are enormous interests at stake, and that was why I sought to lay those out earlier.

CORNYN: Well, as you know, we recently hit the 4,000 dead in Iraq as a result of armed combat; 373 of those called Texas home, my home state. And I recently went to a memorial service for a young 24- year-old soldier named Jose Rubio, who lost his life in Iraq.

And, at that memorial service, as you would expect, everyone in the family was sad, and of course we all grieve with them for their loss, but I think his family took considerable comfort in knowing that Joe Rubio was doing something he believed in, something important, and something that contributed to the safety and security of his family back here at home as well as the rest of the American people.

Do you believe young soldiers like Joe Rubio are making such a contribution to the safety and security of their families back home and the American people?

PETRAEUS: I do, Senator.

CORNYN: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Get more Legislative coverage inside the Virtual Capitol

Permalink | Comments (19) | Post your comment Categories: U.S. Senate